U.S. v. YEAGER, 11-CR-215A. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20120601e08
Filed: May 30, 2012
Latest Update: May 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). On May 2, 2012, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that to the extent that defendant's omnibus motion seeks suppression of statements, the motion should be denied as moot. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by th
Summary: ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). On May 2, 2012, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that to the extent that defendant's omnibus motion seeks suppression of statements, the motion should be denied as moot. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the..
More
ORDER
RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 2, 2012, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that to the extent that defendant's omnibus motion seeks suppression of statements, the motion should be denied as moot.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendant's omnibus motion seeking suppression of statements is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
