U.S. v. HARPER, 05-CR-6068L (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20140320c85
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2014
Summary: DECISION & ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. By Decision and Order filed January 22, 2014, this Court denied defendant Glenn Harper's pro se motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. #235). The Court assumes the parties' familiarity with that decision and order as well as the prior appealability in this case. Harper has now filed a motion to alter the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (Dkt. #236). The Court has reviewed Harper's most recent motion and finds no reason
Summary: DECISION & ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. By Decision and Order filed January 22, 2014, this Court denied defendant Glenn Harper's pro se motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Dkt. #235). The Court assumes the parties' familiarity with that decision and order as well as the prior appealability in this case. Harper has now filed a motion to alter the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (Dkt. #236). The Court has reviewed Harper's most recent motion and finds no reason w..
More
DECISION & ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
By Decision and Order filed January 22, 2014, this Court denied defendant Glenn Harper's pro se motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. #235). The Court assumes the parties' familiarity with that decision and order as well as the prior appealability in this case.
Harper has now filed a motion to alter the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (Dkt. #236). The Court has reviewed Harper's most recent motion and finds no reason whatsoever to alter or modify the Court's prior January 22, 2014 decision denying Harper's motion pursuant to § 2255; nor do I find any reason to grant a certificate of appealability. Harper has failed to make a substantial
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
