Cox v. Cronin, 13-CV-743-A (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20160502d00
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On March 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 50) recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41) be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in the case, and no objections having been timely
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On March 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 50) recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41) be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in the case, and no objections having been timely f..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On March 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 50) recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41) be granted.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in the case, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted.
The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment for defendants and close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
