U.S. v. Pigeon, 17-CR-190-A. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20180605c12
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . The defendant, G. Steven Pigeon, appeals a May 1, 2018 Decision and Order of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer that denied defendant Pigeon's request of the United States for disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 of two particular search warrant applications and warrants. Dkt. No. 23. Appellate review of the Decision and Order is by a clearly erroneous or contrary to law standard of review. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). The Court he
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . The defendant, G. Steven Pigeon, appeals a May 1, 2018 Decision and Order of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer that denied defendant Pigeon's request of the United States for disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 of two particular search warrant applications and warrants. Dkt. No. 23. Appellate review of the Decision and Order is by a clearly erroneous or contrary to law standard of review. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). The Court hea..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.
The defendant, G. Steven Pigeon, appeals a May 1, 2018 Decision and Order of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer that denied defendant Pigeon's request of the United States for disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 of two particular search warrant applications and warrants. Dkt. No. 23. Appellate review of the Decision and Order is by a clearly erroneous or contrary to law standard of review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
The Court heard oral argument of defendant Pigeon's appeal on May 31, 2018. The well-reasoned Decision and Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The defendant's appeal, Dkt. No. 24, is therefore denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
