Dublino v. Thomas, 18-CV-6010L. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20181108m00
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2018
Summary: DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's third motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 30). On October 26, 2018, this Court issued a Decision & Order denying plaintif
Summary: DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's third motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 30). On October 26, 2018, this Court issued a Decision & Order denying plaintiff..
More
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's third motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 30). On October 26, 2018, this Court issued a Decision & Order denying plaintiff's previous requests for appointment of counsel. (Docket ## 24, 25, 29). Plaintiff's current motion does not present any new information to alter this Court's previous determination. Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated in my October 26, 2018 Decision & Order (Docket # 29), plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket # 30) is DENIED without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
