Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Salim v. County of Erie, 15-CV-418-A. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. New York Number: infdco20190128a13 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA , District Judge . This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On December 19, 2018, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69) recommending that defendants' multiple motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 41, 43, 46, 55 & 60) be granted. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, pro se plaintiff Salim's
More

DECISION AND ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On December 19, 2018, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69) recommending that defendants' multiple motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 41, 43, 46, 55 & 60) be granted.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, pro se plaintiff Salim's objections, defendants' responses, and it is hereby

ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and giving due consideration to plaintiff's status as a pro se litigant by affording his contentions the most favorable reading possible in the circumstances, the defendants' motions for dismissal (Dkt. Nos. 39, 41, 43, 46, 55 & 60) are all granted as specified in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69), and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment dismissing the action in its entirety as against each defendant.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer