Dublino v. Thomas, 18-CV-6010L. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20191105759
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2019
Summary: DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's fifth motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 78). Plaintiff's previous requests for appointment of counsel have all been den
Summary: DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's fifth motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 78). Plaintiff's previous requests for appointment of counsel have all been deni..
More
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's fifth motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 78). Plaintiff's previous requests for appointment of counsel have all been denied. (Docket ## 29, 31, 49, 67). Plaintiff's current motion does not present any information to alter this Court's previous determinations. Accordingly, for the reasons in the previous Decisions & Orders (Docket # 29, 31, 49, 67), plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket # 78) is DENIED without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
