DECISION AND ORDER

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge.

Defendant Robert L. Williams, Jr. ("Defendant") is charged in an Indictment returned on June 14, 2018, with felon in possession of firearms and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). (Dkt. 4).1 This Court referred all pretrial matters in the case to United States Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). (Dkt. 5).

On January 23, 2020, Magistrate Judge Schroeder issued a Report, Recommendation and Order ("Report and Recommendation") recommending denial of Defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized on May 16, 2018, from 116 Reed Street, Buffalo, New York, pursuant to a search warrant issued by Judge Schroeder, and "out of court and in court identification as a result of unduly suggestive photo `showups.'" (Dkt. 22 at 1).2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the parties had 14 days after being served a copy of the Report and Recommendation to file objections. No objections were filed.

The Court is not required to review de novo those portions of a report and recommendation to which objections were not filed. Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) ("Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party's right to review."); see Molefe v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 602 F.Supp.2d 485, 487 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (to trigger the de novo review standard, objections to a report "must be specific and clearly aimed at particular findings in the magistrate judge's proposal").

Notwithstanding the lack of objections, the Court has conducted a careful review of the Report and Recommendation as well as the filings previously made in the case, and finds no reason to reject or modify the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Schroeder. Therefore, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 42). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this Court denies Defendant's motion to suppress (Dkt. 22).

SO ORDERED.