Filed: Dec. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2010
Summary: { 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, GWIN, TYACK, and CUPP, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent. W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for O'CONNOR, J. G. GARY TYACK, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for LANZINGER, J. O'DONNELL, J., dissenting. { 2} Because I do not agree that juries should be instructed on alternate theories of recovery in cases of this distin
Summary: { 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, GWIN, TYACK, and CUPP, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent. W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for O'CONNOR, J. G. GARY TYACK, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for LANZINGER, J. O'DONNELL, J., dissenting. { 2} Because I do not agree that juries should be instructed on alternate theories of recovery in cases of this distinc..
More
{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.
BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, GWIN, TYACK, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
LUNDBERG STRATTON and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for O'CONNOR, J.
G. GARY TYACK, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for LANZINGER, J.
O'DONNELL, J., dissenting.
{¶ 2} Because I do not agree that juries should be instructed on alternate theories of recovery in cases of this distinction, I would reverse the judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.
