STATE v. FARAJ, 128 Ohio St.3d 233 (2010)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Number: inohco20101229676
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2010
Summary: { 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. { 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. BROWN, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hodge, 128 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-6320, 941 N.E.2d 768.
PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
BROWN, C.J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Hodge.
Source: Leagle
