DILLARD v. CLEVELAND METRO. SCHOOL DIST., 131 Ohio St.3d 371 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Number: inohco20120327611
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2012
Summary: { 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law I. { 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of the Eighth District's en banc decision in DiGiorgio v. Cleveland, 196 Ohio App.3d 575 , 2011-Ohio-5824, 964 N.E.2d 495. O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and McGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law I.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of the Eighth District's en banc decision in DiGiorgio v. Cleveland, 196 Ohio App.3d 575, 2011-Ohio-5824, 964 N.E.2d 495.
O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and McGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
