BURLINGAME v. ESTATE OF BURLINGAME, 134 Ohio St.3d 490 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Number: inohco20121206652
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2012
Summary: { 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380 , 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court's opinion in Anderson v. Massillon. O'CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and McGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court's opinion in Anderson v. Massillon.
O'CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and McGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Source: Leagle