STATE EX REL. ULLMANN v. JOBSOHIO, 138 Ohio St.3d 83 (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Number: inohco20131203437
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2013
Summary: { 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. { 2} Upon consideration of respondents' motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed. O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur. O'DONNELL, J., not participating.
{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.
{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents' motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.
O'DONNELL, J., not participating.
Source: Leagle
