SZABO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:13 CV 2485. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140801798
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed July 11, 2014 (Doc. 17). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo dete
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed July 11, 2014 (Doc. 17). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo deter..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed July 11, 2014 (Doc. 17). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Plaintiff's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court affirms the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff benefits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
