TAYLOR v. BRUNSMAN, 3:12CV800. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140821c33
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER AND DECISION JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge. The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Baughman, submitted in this matter on June 27, 2014. Doc. 21. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to 28 U.S.
Summary: ORDER AND DECISION JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge. The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Baughman, submitted in this matter on June 27, 2014. Doc. 21. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C..
More
ORDER AND DECISION
JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.
The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Baughman, submitted in this matter on June 27, 2014. Doc. 21. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
