KALB v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 5:14-CV-1128. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141201639
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KATHLEEN B. BURKE, Magistrate Judge. On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), wherein they request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Doc. 15 ("Joint Stipulation"). The parties stipulate that: Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before a
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KATHLEEN B. BURKE, Magistrate Judge. On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), wherein they request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Doc. 15 ("Joint Stipulation"). The parties stipulate that: Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before an..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KATHLEEN B. BURKE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Doc. 15 ("Joint Stipulation"). The parties stipulate that:
Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before an ALJ, where Plaintiff may testify and present additional arguments and evidence. The ALJ will further evaluate the claimant's credibility, address the opinions from the Veteran's Administration and address the discrepancies between the opinions of the state agency reviewing physicians. The ALJ will also consider whether additional testimony from medical or vocational experts is necessary. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential evaluation process as needed to reach a de novo decision.
Doc. 15.
Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation, the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
