CUMBERLEDGE v. SLOAN, 1:13 CV 2067. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141211c36
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed November 17, 2014 (Doc. 10). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Cumberledge's Petition as procedurally defaulted. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed November 17, 2014 (Doc. 10). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Cumberledge's Petition as procedurally defaulted. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed November 17, 2014 (Doc. 10). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Cumberledge's Petition as procedurally defaulted.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court dismisses the Petition with prejudice. This Court further certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
