Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BRADLEY, 3:15 CV 58. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150410d18 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY , District Judge . This criminal case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II, with consent of the parties, to conduct a change of plea hearing. The Magistrate judge filed his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8); no Objection has been filed. This Court finds that the requirements of Federal Criminal Rule 11 have been satisfied. Defendant was properly afforded her rights under the United States Constitution; Defen
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This criminal case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II, with consent of the parties, to conduct a change of plea hearing. The Magistrate judge filed his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8); no Objection has been filed.

This Court finds that the requirements of Federal Criminal Rule 11 have been satisfied. Defendant was properly afforded her rights under the United States Constitution; Defendant was correctly found to be competent, aware of the charges and consequences of conviction and of the waiver of her rights; and Defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily consented to the Magistrate Judge and entered a guilty plea for which there was an adequate factual basis.

After a de novo review of the record and R&R, the Magistrate's findings are adopted, Defendant's guilty plea is accepted, and a finding of guilty is entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer