Thrasher v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 1:16-CV-2684. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171205c64
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND SARA LIOI , District Judge . Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or re
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND SARA LIOI , District Judge . Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or rec..
More
ORDER OF REMAND
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. [. . .]
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The R&R was filed on November 17, 2017.
On December 1, 2017, defendant filed a response indicating that there would be no objection to the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the final decision be vacated and the case remanded because the Administrative Law Judge failed to comply with the requirements of the Social Security regulations for weighing medical source evidence.
No objections having been heard, the Court adopts the recommendation, vacates the decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and remands this matter for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
