Green v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17 CV 1576. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180717c11
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY , District Judge . Plaintiff Elwin Green filed this Complaint seeking judicial review of the denial of his application for supplemental security income (Doc. 1). This case was referred to Magistrate Judge William Baughman for a Report and Recommendation (R&R) under Local Rule 72.2. Following briefing (Docs. 12-13, 20) and oral argument (Doc. 18), the Magistrate Judge recommends this Court reverse and remand for further administrative proce
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION JACK ZOUHARY , District Judge . Plaintiff Elwin Green filed this Complaint seeking judicial review of the denial of his application for supplemental security income (Doc. 1). This case was referred to Magistrate Judge William Baughman for a Report and Recommendation (R&R) under Local Rule 72.2. Following briefing (Docs. 12-13, 20) and oral argument (Doc. 18), the Magistrate Judge recommends this Court reverse and remand for further administrative procee..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Elwin Green filed this Complaint seeking judicial review of the denial of his application for supplemental security income (Doc. 1). This case was referred to Magistrate Judge William Baughman for a Report and Recommendation (R&R) under Local Rule 72.2. Following briefing (Docs. 12-13, 20) and oral argument (Doc. 18), the Magistrate Judge recommends this Court reverse and remand for further administrative proceedings (Doc. 21). The Commissioner does not object to the R&R (Doc. 23).
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which objections are made. Failure to file objections within the timeframe set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). This Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it accurately states the facts and law. This Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety.
Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner is vacated, and the case is remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the R&R.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
