Hoston v. Bracy, 1:16CV1872. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180718c88
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER AND DECISION JOHN R. ADAMS , District Judge . On April 25, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ruiz submitted a Report and Recommended Decision ("R&R") addressing the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court reject Petitioner Hoston's four grounds for relief and dismiss the petition. To date, Petitioner Hoston has not filed any objections. Thus, upon due consideration and no objections having been filed by
Summary: ORDER AND DECISION JOHN R. ADAMS , District Judge . On April 25, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ruiz submitted a Report and Recommended Decision ("R&R") addressing the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court reject Petitioner Hoston's four grounds for relief and dismiss the petition. To date, Petitioner Hoston has not filed any objections. Thus, upon due consideration and no objections having been filed by t..
More
ORDER AND DECISION
JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.
On April 25, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ruiz submitted a Report and Recommended Decision ("R&R") addressing the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court reject Petitioner Hoston's four grounds for relief and dismiss the petition. To date, Petitioner Hoston has not filed any objections. Thus, upon due consideration and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the R&R and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is ordered that Respondent's habeas petition is DENIED, and is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
