Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:18-cv-02485. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20181231990 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: INTERIM REPORT & RECOMMENDATION KATHLEEN B. BURKE , Magistrate Judge . On October 29, 2018, Plaintiff Tushana Jacobs filed a Complaint against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit ("IFP Application"). Doc. 2. On November 6, 2018, the undersigned found that Plaintiff's IFP Application was incomplete or not fully explained and ordered Plaintiff to submit a supplemental or amended
More

INTERIM REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

On October 29, 2018, Plaintiff Tushana Jacobs filed a Complaint against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit ("IFP Application"). Doc. 2. On November 6, 2018, the undersigned found that Plaintiff's IFP Application was incomplete or not fully explained and ordered Plaintiff to submit a supplemental or amended IFP Application so that the Court would have a proper basis upon which to evaluate her request to proceed without prepayment of fees. Doc. 5. Plaintiff was ordered to file the supplemental or amended IFP Application within fourteen (14) days and warned that failure to do so could result in denial of her IFP Application. Doc. 5. Plaintiff did not comply with the undersigned's November 6, 2018, order. On December 6, 2018, the undersigned provided Plaintiff with another opportunity to file a supplemental or amended IFP Application. See 12/6/18 non-document order. Plaintiff was ordered to comply with the November 6, 2018, order by December 14, 2018, and warned that failure to do so could result in denial of her IFP Application or dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute. Id.

Considering Plaintiff's failure to file a supplemental or amended IFP Application, the undersigned recommends that the Court DENY Plaintiff's IFP Application (Doc. 2) and order Plaintiff to pay the required filing fee.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer