MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37) to Grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30) and Deny Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 25) as Moot. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by April 9, 2019. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30) and DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Additionally, the Court DENIES Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 25) as moot.

Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right directly related to his conviction or custody. Therefore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); FED. R. APP. P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.