Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Butler v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 1:19-cv-876. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190501f69 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2019
Summary: OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. 5 ] JAMES S. GWIN , District Judge . This case concerns an automotive accident. 1 Plaintiff Brian Butler sued in Ohio state court, claiming he suffered property damages, towing and storage expenses, medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and lost wages. 2 Defendants Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and David W. Dunn removed here under the Court's diversity jurisdiction. 3 Butler now seeks to remand the case to state court. 4 The
More

OPINION & ORDER

[Resolving Doc. 5]

This case concerns an automotive accident.1 Plaintiff Brian Butler sued in Ohio state court, claiming he suffered property damages, towing and storage expenses, medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and lost wages.2

Defendants Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and David W. Dunn removed here under the Court's diversity jurisdiction.3 Butler now seeks to remand the case to state court.4

The Court has jurisdiction over suits between citizens of different states, where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.5 Here, there is no dispute that the parties are citizens of different states, only whether the amount in controversy is met.6

When a case is removed from state court, the Court presumes the plaintiff's claimed damages are correct.7 However, where the plaintiff seeks indeterminate damages, the defendant may demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the case is worth more than $75,000.8

Here, Butler seeks "an amount exceeding" $25,000 in compensatory damages and "an amount exceeding" $25,000 in exemplary damages.9 Thus, the Court presumes the case is worth at least $50,000. Defendants must show the remaining $25,000.01.

They have done so by demonstrating that Plaintiff's compensatory damages greatly exceed $25,000. According to Defendants, discovery reveals $47,694.32 in medical bills alone.10 That amount would not include Plaintiff's lost wages, property damages, towing expenses, or pain and suffering. And, in the Court's experience, these other damage categories are likely to exceed the $2,305.69 needed to hit the statutory threshold.11

Considering Plaintiff's documented medical expenses, his requested punitive damages, and the likely value of his other claimed damages, the Court concludes the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Thus, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Doc. 1-1 ¶ 1.
2. E.g., id. ¶ 3.
3. Doc. 1.
4. Doc. 5. Defendants oppose. Doc. 6.
5. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1).
6. Doc. 5 at 3 ("Plaintiff concedes that the first element, diversity, likely exists in the instant case.").
7. Freeman v. Blue Ridge Paper Prod., Inc., 551 F.3d 405, 409 (6th Cir. 2008).
8. Halsey v. AGCO Corp., 755 F. App'x 524 (6th Cir. 2018); Naji v. Lincoln, 665 F. App'x 397, 400 (6th Cir. 2016).
9. Doc. 1-1 at 6.
10. Doc. 6 at 3.
11. See Halsey, 755 F. App'x at 527-528.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer