Mayer v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:18CV2235. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200128f20
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT ENTRY JAMES G. CARR, SR. , District Judge . In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with this judgment entry, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 1. Mayer's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) be, and the same hereby are, overruled. 2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of the court. 3. The Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for benefits be, and
Summary: JUDGMENT ENTRY JAMES G. CARR, SR. , District Judge . In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with this judgment entry, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 1. Mayer's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) be, and the same hereby are, overruled. 2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of the court. 3. The Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for benefits be, and t..
More
JUDGMENT ENTRY
JAMES G. CARR, SR., District Judge.
In accordance with the order filed contemporaneously with this judgment entry, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
1. Mayer's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) be, and the same hereby are, overruled.
2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of the court.
3. The Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for benefits be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
