WHITAKER v. WARDEN, Case Number: 1:10cv306. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120127c50
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed on December 30, 2011 (Doc. 34), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 16, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed on December 30, 2011 (Doc. 34), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 16, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to f..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed on December 30, 2011 (Doc. 34), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 16, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) which was denied pursuant to the order entered on November 16, 2011 (Doc. . 29).
Accordingly, to the extent petitioner's "Judicial Notice" is construed as a motion seeking relief from the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), it is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
