Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION, 2:11-cv-1016. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20120127c81 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. On January 24, 2012, Michael Webb filed a motion to intervene (ECF No. 66) and a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 67). Pursuant to S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 65.1(a), the Court therefore held an informal preliminary telephone conference with the parties on January 25, 2012. During this conference, counsel for Defendants stated that Defendants do not oppose the motion to intervene and the motion for a temporary restr
More

ORDER

GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.

On January 24, 2012, Michael Webb filed a motion to intervene (ECF No. 66) and a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 67). Pursuant to S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 65.1(a), the Court therefore held an informal preliminary telephone conference with the parties on January 25, 2012. During this conference, counsel for Defendants stated that Defendants do not oppose the motion to intervene and the motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.

The Court GRANTS the motion to intervene. (ECF No. 66.) The Clerk shall detach Webb's proffered complaint and attachments and file said material on the docket. (ECF No. 66-1.) This Court also GRANTS Webb's motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 67). It is thus ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the State of Ohio, and any person acting on its behalf, is hereby STAYED from implementing an order for the execution of Michael Webb issued by any court of the State of Ohio until further Order from the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer