WASHBURN v. LAWRENCE COUNTY, 1:10-cv-464. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120224c98
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Having failed to resolve a prior dispute as anticipated in the minute entry of January 31, 2012, the parties appeared today for a telephonic conference on three discovery-related motions: (1) the motion of Defendant Attitude Aviation for leave to conduct a Rule 35 Examination; (2) the motion off Plaintiff to compel Attitude Aviation to answer an interrogatory; and (3) Defendants' joint motion to extend certain expert disclosure deadlines. The Court
Summary: ORDER STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Having failed to resolve a prior dispute as anticipated in the minute entry of January 31, 2012, the parties appeared today for a telephonic conference on three discovery-related motions: (1) the motion of Defendant Attitude Aviation for leave to conduct a Rule 35 Examination; (2) the motion off Plaintiff to compel Attitude Aviation to answer an interrogatory; and (3) Defendants' joint motion to extend certain expert disclosure deadlines. The Court ..
More
ORDER
STEPHANIE K. BOWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Having failed to resolve a prior dispute as anticipated in the minute entry of January 31, 2012, the parties appeared today for a telephonic conference on three discovery-related motions: (1) the motion of Defendant Attitude Aviation for leave to conduct a Rule 35 Examination; (2) the motion off Plaintiff to compel Attitude Aviation to answer an interrogatory; and (3) Defendants' joint motion to extend certain expert disclosure deadlines.
The Court having reviewed the parties' motions and having heard oral argument, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's motion for leave to conduct a Rule 35 examination (Doc. 66) and joint motion to extend Defendants' expert disclosure deadline (Doc. 72), are GRANTED, subject to the following conditions:
a. Said exam must be completed on or before March 2, 2012;
b. The requested vocational examination shall not exceed the time limitation of 2.5 hours;
c. Dr. Kulick's report shall be disclosed not later than March 16, 2012, with the vocational expert to be made available for deposition prior to the close of discovery;
d. All other objections presented by Plaintiff, including but not limited to the scope of the examination, are hereby overruled;
2. Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendant to respond to an outstanding interrogatory (Doc. 68) is DENIED AS MOOT;
3. Plaintiff shall identify and disclose the report of any rebuttal vocational expert on or before March 30, 2012, and shall make that expert available for deposition not later than April 16, 2012;
4. All other deadlines remain unchanged.
Source: Leagle
