PEABODY v. PERRY TOWNSHIP, OHIO, 2:10-cv-1078. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120418d96
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARK R. ABEL, Magistrate Judge. On April 16, 2012, the parties filed a paper entitled "Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 49). Stipulated alterations to the case schedule are expressly prohibited by S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 6.1(b). Furthermore, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), even a request to modify the case schedule would have to demonstrate "good cause" for the alteration. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to STRIKE this document from the record.
ORDER
MARK R. ABEL, Magistrate Judge.
On April 16, 2012, the parties filed a paper entitled "Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 49). Stipulated alterations to the case schedule are expressly prohibited by S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 6.1(b). Furthermore, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), even a request to modify the case schedule would have to demonstrate "good cause" for the alteration.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to STRIKE this document from the record.
Source: Leagle
