U.S. v. ELSASS, Civil Action 2:10-CV-336. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120531d22
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge. On May 9, 2012, the Court ordered defendants to provide a supplemental, more detailed response to Interrogatory No. 5 no later than May 18, 2012. Opinion and Order , Doc. No. 122. On the day that the supplemental response was due, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time until May 25, 2012 in which to provide their response. Doc. No. 125. Plaintiff has now opposed defendants' motion for an extension, representing that defendants failed to
Summary: ORDER NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge. On May 9, 2012, the Court ordered defendants to provide a supplemental, more detailed response to Interrogatory No. 5 no later than May 18, 2012. Opinion and Order , Doc. No. 122. On the day that the supplemental response was due, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time until May 25, 2012 in which to provide their response. Doc. No. 125. Plaintiff has now opposed defendants' motion for an extension, representing that defendants failed to s..
More
ORDER
NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge.
On May 9, 2012, the Court ordered defendants to provide a supplemental, more detailed response to Interrogatory No. 5 no later than May 18, 2012. Opinion and Order, Doc. No. 122. On the day that the supplemental response was due, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time until May 25, 2012 in which to provide their response. Doc. No. 125. Plaintiff has now opposed defendants' motion for an extension, representing that defendants failed to supplement their response by May 25, 2012. Doc. No. 126.
If defendants intend to further reply in support of their motion, Doc. No. 125, they must do so no later than June 7, 2012.
Source: Leagle
