CHAPIN v. ASTRUE, 2:11-cv-00069. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120618753
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's March 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Christine Chapin is not disabled within the meaning of the Act. Upon de novo review in accordance with the provis
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's March 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Christine Chapin is not disabled within the meaning of the Act. Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisi..
More
ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's March 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Christine Chapin is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.
Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.
This action is hereby DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
