Filed: Jun. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 25, 2012 (Doc. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 11, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the ALJ's non-disability determination is
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 25, 2012 (Doc. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 11, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the ALJ's non-disability determination is ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 25, 2012 (Doc. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 11, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the ALJ's non-disability determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record presented.
Therefore, plaintiff's motion for contempt, request for audio-visual record, and request for addendum (Docs. 19, 25 and 26) are DENIED.
Plaintiff's motion to expedite (Doc. 31) is GRANTED.
Defendant's decision is found NOT TO BE SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, REVERSED and REMANDED for additional review under Sentence Four.
This case is hereby TERMINATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
