JONES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:11-cv-228. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120710a40
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 12, 2012 (Doc. 13). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters , 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections t
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 12, 2012 (Doc. 13). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters , 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to..
More
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 12, 2012 (Doc. 13).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff Supplemental Security Income benefits is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Administrative Law Judge is to reevaluate: a) the weight to be given to each medical opinion; and b) Plaintiff's credibility.
Source: Leagle
