U.S. v. EASLEY, 2:11-cr-251(2). (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120710a47
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, Magistrate Judge. This matter came before the Court for a hearing regarding possible sanctions for a violation of a release condition pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3148. Having conferred with counsel and given the position of the parties as well as the United States Pretrial Services Officer, the Court hereby AMENDS the conditions of Defendant's release as follows: • Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; edu
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, Magistrate Judge. This matter came before the Court for a hearing regarding possible sanctions for a violation of a release condition pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3148. Having conferred with counsel and given the position of the parties as well as the United States Pretrial Services Officer, the Court hereby AMENDS the conditions of Defendant's release as follows: • Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; educ..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court for a hearing regarding possible sanctions for a violation of a release condition pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148. Having conferred with counsel and given the position of the parties as well as the United States Pretrial Services Officer, the Court hereby AMENDS the conditions of Defendant's release as follows:
• Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; education; religious services; medical, substance abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances; court-ordered obligations; or other activities pre-approved by the pretrial services office or supervising officer.
• Location Monitoring. You will submit to Radio Frequency location monitoring and abide by all of the program requirements and instructions provided by the pretrial services officer or supervising officer related to the proper operation of the technology.
All previously imposed conditions of Defendant's release, as set forth in the Court's November 15, 2011 remain in full force and effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
