Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McKNIGHT v. BOBBY, 2:09-cv-059. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20120712c27 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2012
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge. This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Respondent's Objection (Doc. No. 71), to the Magistrate Judge's Decision and Order (Doc. No. 68) granting Petitioner's Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 60). Petitioner has filed a Response to the Objection (Doc. No. 74) and Respondent has filed a Reply in Support (Doc. No. 75). The District Judge has recommitted the matter to the Magistrate Judge for a supplemental opinio
More

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge.

This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Respondent's Objection (Doc. No. 71), to the Magistrate Judge's Decision and Order (Doc. No. 68) granting Petitioner's Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 60). Petitioner has filed a Response to the Objection (Doc. No. 74) and Respondent has filed a Reply in Support (Doc. No. 75). The District Judge has recommitted the matter to the Magistrate Judge for a supplemental opinion and recommendation (Doc. No. 78).

Having considered the parties' arguments, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Objection be overruled on the basis set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Opinion and Recommendations in Waddy v. Coyle, Case No. 3:98-cv-084 (Doc. No. 188).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer