Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. INK TECHNOLOGIES PRINTER SUPPLIES, LLC, 1:10-cv-00564-MRB. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20130211974 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2012
Summary: STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CONSENT JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the stipulated motion of Plaintiff, Lexmark International, Inc. ("Lexmark") and John Doe Defendant Fanelli Boys, Inc., which has a place of business at 656 7th Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26101 ("Fanelli"), for entry of Stipulated Permanent Injunction, Consent Judgment and Dismissal With Prejudice, having agreed to a compromise and settle
More

STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CONSENT JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the stipulated motion of Plaintiff, Lexmark International, Inc. ("Lexmark") and John Doe Defendant Fanelli Boys, Inc., which has a place of business at 656 7th Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26101 ("Fanelli"), for entry of Stipulated Permanent Injunction, Consent Judgment and Dismissal With Prejudice, having agreed to a compromise and settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY FOUND, ORDERED, ADJUDGED WITH CONSENT OF THE PARTIES that:

1. Lexmark is in the business of developing, manufacturing and selling laser printers and toner cartridges—including corresponding versions thereof made by Lexmark under private label for Dell, IBM, Toshiba, Nashuatec, Unisys, and Source Technologies, including toner cartridges for Lexmark's T420; T520/522; T610/612/614/616; T620/622; T630/632/634; T640/642/644; E120; E220; E230/232/234/238/240; E320/322; E321/323; E330/332; E340/342; and E250/350/352/450 laser printers as well as the private-label versions thereof (collectively, "the Toner Cartridges").

2. Lexmark owns and has standing to sue for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,337,032; 5,634,169; 5,758,231; 5,758,233; 5,768,661; 5,802,432; 5,875,378; 5,995,772; 6,009,291; 6,078,771; 6,397,015; 6,459,876; 6,487,383; 6,496,662; 6,678,489; 6,816,692; 6,871,031; 6,879,792; 7,139,510; 7,233,760; and 7,305,204 (the "Lexmark Patents").

3. Fanelli, its parent, divisions, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors and assigns and its directors, officers, and employees, or any of them is in the business, among other things, of importing and/or selling remanufactured Toner Cartridges in which rights in the Lexmark Patent rights were not exhausted, compatible versions of the Toner Cartridges, and/or clones of the Toner Cartridges (collectively, "the Accused Cartridges").

4. The Lexmark Patents are valid and enforceable against Fanelli.

5. The following table identifies the patent claims of the Lexmark Patents that are satisfied literally by the Toner Cartridges and the Accused Cartridges:

Toner Cartridges/Accused Cartridges Patent E120 E23X/E24X/ E25X/ T52X/T61X/ E320/22 E220 and E33X/E34X E35X/E45X T62X/T63X/T64X E321/23 5,337,032 1,5,6 5,634,169 1-3,32-34, 32,36,42 32,36,42 36, 42 5,758,231 1-16 1-16 1-16 1-16 5,758,233 1-4 5,768,661 1,2,3,6 5,802,432 1-3, 7-9 5,875,378 1-3,12-14,24 5,995,772 1-3,5,7-9, 14,15,22, 14,15,22, 12,14-18,20,21 32-34 32-34 6,009,291 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 6,078,771 1,5,6,10, 1,5,6,10, 1,5,6,10, 1,2,5,6,10, 12,13,15 12,13,15 12,13,15 12,13,15 6,397,015 1-4,7-12, 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 14-19,22-24 9,17,19 9,17,19 6,459,876 1-28 6,487,383 1,2,6, 1,2,6, 1,2,6, 1,2,6,10, 19 19 10,15,19 10,15,19 10,15,19 11,15,19 6,496,662 1,3,5,7 1,3,5,7 6,678,489 5-6 5-6 6,816,692 1-13 1-13 1-13 6,871,031 1-6,8-12 1-6,8-12 6,879,792 1-11 1-11 7,139,510 1-10 1-10 7,233,760 11,12,14 11,12,14 11,12,14 7,305,204 1-20 1-8,10-13

6. The importation, use, remanufacture, manufacture, offer to sell or sale by anyone other than Lexmark of any Toner Cartridge that was originally sold outside the United States constitutes an infringement the above-identified claims in the Lexmark Patents.

7. The importation, use, remanufacture, manufacture, offer to sell or sale by anyone other than Lexmark of any Toner Cartridge in the United States under which Lexmark's Patent rights were not exhausted constitutes an infringement the above-identified claims in the Lexmark Patents.

8. Except for any cartridge in which Lexmark's Patent rights have been exhausted, this Court permanently enjoins Fanelli as well as those persons or companies in active concert or participation with Fanelli who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise from making, using, selling, offering for sale or importing into the United States Accused Cartridges that infringe any of the above-identified patent claims or are not colorably different from the Accused Cartridges.

9. Nothing herein limits or shall be construed to limit in any way Fanelli's activities with respect to toner cartridges in which Lexmark's patent rights have been exhausted. Further, nothing herein limits or shall be construed to limit in any way Fanelli's activities with respect to any Lexmark Patents that have expired, lapsed, are no longer enforceable, or have found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction.

10. Fanelli represents and warrants that it has disclosed to Lexmark the quantity and type of all Accused Cartridges that it imported into the United States.

11. Fanelli consents to personal jurisdiction by this Court, consents to venue in this District, and waives services of process for this action.

12. This Court retains jurisdiction over Lexmark and Fanelli to the extent necessary to enforce the terms of this Stipulated Permanent Injunction, Consent Judgment, and Dismissal With Prejudice and the agreement between the parties.

13. This Stipulated Permanent Injunction, Consent Judgment, and Dismissal With Prejudice shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Lexmark and Fanelli as well as each of its respective subsidiaries, corporate parents, affiliates, and/or successors and assigns.

14. All claims between Lexmark and Fanelli are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer