MAYFIELD v. KAISER PICKLES, LLC, 1:12-cv-229. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130530f18
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 29, 2013
Latest Update: May 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed May 6, 2013 (Doc. 45). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed May 6, 2013 (Doc. 45). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to t..
More
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed May 6, 2013 (Doc. 45).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. Plaintiff remains free to apply to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal.
Source: Leagle
