U.S. v. McDANIEL, 1:06-CR-084 (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130612c67
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. Upon the Court's Order for an Answer, the United States has responded by agreeing that Defendant is entitled to be re-sentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act (Doc. No. 118). Accordingly, it is respectfully recommended that the Motion to Vacate be granted, that Defendant's sentence be vacated, and that Defendant be resentenced unde
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. Upon the Court's Order for an Answer, the United States has responded by agreeing that Defendant is entitled to be re-sentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act (Doc. No. 118). Accordingly, it is respectfully recommended that the Motion to Vacate be granted, that Defendant's sentence be vacated, and that Defendant be resentenced under..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MICHAEL R. MERZ, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255. Upon the Court's Order for an Answer, the United States has responded by agreeing that Defendant is entitled to be re-sentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act (Doc. No. 118).
Accordingly, it is respectfully recommended that the Motion to Vacate be granted, that Defendant's sentence be vacated, and that Defendant be resentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act.
Source: Leagle