COLBERT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:12-cv-888. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130627e70
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge. Based on the parties' stipulation, Doc. No. 24, is RECOMMENDED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and that the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that final judgment be entered accordingly. If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fo
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge. Based on the parties' stipulation, Doc. No. 24, is RECOMMENDED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and that the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that final judgment be entered accordingly. If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fou..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NORAH McCANN KING, Magistrate Judge.
Based on the parties' stipulation, Doc. No. 24, is RECOMMENDED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and that the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that final judgment be entered accordingly.
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Source: Leagle
