BROOKS v. COLVIN, 2:12-cv-434. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130701b25
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's April 11, 2013 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 17.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be remanded under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence 6, for consideration of new and material evidence, and that the case be administratively closed . ( Id. at Page ID # 716.) The Report and Recommendation also advised the p
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's April 11, 2013 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 17.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be remanded under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence 6, for consideration of new and material evidence, and that the case be administratively closed . ( Id. at Page ID # 716.) The Report and Recommendation also advised the pa..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's April 11, 2013 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 17.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be remanded under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 6, for consideration of new and material evidence, and that the case be administratively closed . (Id. at Page ID # 716.) The Report and Recommendation also advised the parties that the failure to object within fourteen days would result in a "waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Id. at Page ID # 716-17.)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have been filed, that the time for filing such objections has expired, and that the Magistrate Judge's reasoning is correct, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, REMANDS pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 6, for consideration of new and material evidence, and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSES the case while the Commissioner is considering the new and material evidence on remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
