SMITH v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:12-cv-645. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130731e87
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed July 8, 2013 (Doc. 16). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed July 8, 2013 (Doc. 16). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to ..
More
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed July 8, 2013 (Doc. 16).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff Supplemental Security Income benefits after January 14, 2010 is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for specific findings on the issues of whether plaintiff's impairments medically improved after January 14, 2010, and whether she remained functionally disabled after that date due to her depression.
Source: Leagle
