GRANNON v. COLVIN, 2:12-cv-494. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130802a68
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court for consideration of the June 25, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). See Doc. 19. The magistrate judge recommended that the court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the repor
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court for consideration of the June 25, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). See Doc. 19. The magistrate judge recommended that the court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the report..
More
ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for consideration of the June 25, 2013, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). See Doc. 19. The magistrate judge recommended that the court affirm the decision of the Commissioner.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the report would result in a "waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court[.]" Doc. 19, p. 12. The time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the report and recommendation.
The court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the court adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the court affirms the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding and this action is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
