Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LOYER v. WHORTON, 1:13cv773. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20140502c27 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on February 18, 2014 (Doc. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired April 22, 2014, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the following claims are DISMISSED f
More

ORDER

SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on February 18, 2014 (Doc. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired April 22, 2014, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the following claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a federal claim for relief under §1983:

1. Plaintiff's claims seeking monetary relief from all defendants in their official capacities; 2. Plaintiff's claims against defendant ODRC; 3. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Crutchfield, McGlothen and John Doe Assistant Chief Inspector; and 4. Plaintiff's claims against John/Jane Does × 100.

See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer