MARK R. ABEL, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Bruce Kempton brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income benefits. This matter is before the Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on the administrative record and the parties' merits briefs.
See Doc. 16.
Kempton further testified to problems with his shoulder for the three or four years prior to the hearing. (PageID 97.) Even though he has had surgery, he "couldn't use it al all." (Id.) He still had limited range of motion after the surgery. (Id.)
Kempton testified that his 16 year old son and wife assist him in activities. (Page-ID 94.) He would occasionally run the vacuum cleaner. (Id.) His most comfortable position was in his recliner or laying down in bed. (Id.) His son performed all the yard work and his wife did the cooking and cleaning. (PageID 100.) Kempton was not involved in any groups or organizations and did little socializing. (Id.)
He also testified to experiencing problems with breathing, and he had "trouble getting air in unless I'm wearing oxygen." (PageID 94-95.) He was using an oxygen tank at the hearing. It had been prescribed in November 2011. (PageID 95.)
Kempton's third medical problem is pain in his neck that went down into his arms and hands. (Id.) His neck pain occurs "about every couple of days." (PageID 96.) He re-ceived injections in his back in 2008, but reported no relief. (Id.)
As to his psychological impairments, Kempton testified that he saw Dr. Kao but treatment ended when she moved. He was having "trouble getting into" additional treatment because the facility was "backed up." (PageID 97.) At the time of the hearing, he was taking Vistaril for anxiety and Zoloft for depression. The medications were prescribed by his primary care physician. (Id.)
Kempton underwent an open right carpal tunnel release in 1999. (PageID 678-79.) Records from the Waverly Health Center show that Kempton was treated for anxiety and mood problems in 2003. (PageID 336-38.) He was treated by Venkati Yerramilli, M.D. at the Waverly Health Center in 2005 for complaints of increasing pain in his left leg and numbness and paresthesia in his left hand. Dr. Yerramilli noted tenderness over the cervical spine at C6-C7. The diagnoses were cervical radiculopathy and pain in the left hand. (PageID 332-33.)
An October 2005 MRI of the cervical spine showed mild degenerative changes. (PageID 339.) A January 2008 MRI of the lumbar spine showed mild wedging of the L1 and L2 vertebra with evidence of Schmorl's nodes and degenerative changes involving the facet joints in the lower lumbosacral spine. (PageID 401.)
Kempton had a left lower extremity EMG in February 2008, which was abnormal. The interpreting physician reported the study is indicative of chronic S1 radiculopathy with both active denervation changes and chronic reinnervation changes. (PageID 505-06.)
In March and April 2008, Kempton received cervical epidural steroid injections to treat cervical radiculitis with degenerative disc disease. (PageID 530-32.) A May 2008 x-ray of the cervical spine showed mild degenerative spondylotic spurring in the midcervical spine. (PageID 504.) An MRI of the cervical spine that same month showed multilevel cervical degenerative disc changes and an extruded midline C6-7 disc was present. (PageID 502-03.) A June 2008 left upper extremity EMG was normal. (PageID 500-01.)
In June 2008, Kempton was evaluated by James Fleming, Jr., M.D. (PageID 681-84.) After reviewing the objective studies and finding that Kempton was neurovascularly intact, Dr. Fleming noted that Kempton had continued radicular symptoms in the left arm with numbness in the left hand. He declined any surgical intervention. (PageID 681.)
On August 7, 2009, Kempton was seen by Dr. Tyree. Among his complaints were low back pain, anxiety, hypercholesterolemia, non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Regarding Kempton's low back pain, the office notes state:
(PageID 360.)(Emphasis in original.) As to his anxiety, the notes state:
(Id.)(Emphasis in original.)
On September 10, 2009, Dr. Tyree's notes state that Kempton was in no apparent distress. (PageID 358.) He reported a history of low back pain, with the discomfort most prominent in the lower left lumbar spine. The pain radiated into the buttocks. Kempton described the pain as constant, moderate in intensity, and sharp. He said the pain had lasted for 15 years. (PageID 355.) On examination, his gait was normal. Straight leg raising was negative. (PageID 358.)
Kempton described true panic attacks and generalized anxiety. Triggers appeared to include crowds and public places. He had a history of depression. He said BuSpar did not work. Dr. Kao had prescribe Klonopin, but Kempton stopped taking it because it did not work. He preferred hydroxyzine, which did work. Kempton was no longer seeing Dr. Kao because she released him with the understanding that Dr. Tyree would continue to prescribe the psychotropic medications. (PageID 355.) On psychiatric examination, Dr. Tyree found that Kempton's affect and demeanor were appropriate. He had normal psychomotor function. His speech patterns were normal. (PageID 358.)
On September 30, 2009, the physical and psychiatric examinations were within normal limits. (PageID 352-53.) Kempton was well developed, well groomed, and in no apparent distress. (PageID 353.) Kempton smoked 1½ packs of cigarettes a day and had a 160 pack-year history. (PageID 351.) Dr. Tyree recommended smoking cessation, exercise, and a low cholesterol/low fat diet. (PageID 353.)
On October 9, 2010, Dr. Provaznik's handwritten office notes state that insomnia was still a problem. (PageID 581.) On June 9, 2010, Kempton was treated for the flu. (PageID 585.) On August 7, 2010, Kempton told Dr. Provaznik that he had insomnia and anxiety. (PageID 583.) On August 8, 2010, Kempton still was not sleeping well. The medication prescribed for insomnia was not working. (PageID 582.) On October 20, 2009, Kempton complained about right shoulder pain. He had a torn rotator cuff that limited the range of motion in his right shoulder. (PageID 580.) On November 13, 2010, Kempton said he had been having anxiety attacks. Diagnoses included recurrent right shoulder pain and chronic insomnia. (PageID 579.) January 8, 2011 state that Kempton said he was only sleeping two hours a night. (PageID 578.) His office notes for February 5 and March 2, 2011 state that Kempton had no new complaints. (PageID 576-77.)
Dr. Provaznik's office notes for April 2, 2011 indicate that plaintiff's C-pap needed to be titrated. Kempton also was examined for right shoulder pain. There was a full range of motion. (PageID 641.) On April 30, 2011, Kempton said that the pain in his back and neck was getting worse. He still had insomnia. (PageID 640.) On May 25, 2011, Kempton told Dr. Provaznik that Trazadone was not helping with his insomnia. (PageID 639.) On June 25, 2011, Kempton got refill of the pain medication (Percocet and Zanoflex). On October 19, September 24, July 20, and August 24, 2011, Kempton was seen to get prescriptions refilled. He had no medical complaints. (PageID 636-37 and 666-68.) On December 7, 2011, Kempton had just gotten out of the hospital, where his diagnoses were bronchial pneumonia, chronic COPD, and emphysema. (PageID 665.)
On examination, Dr. Swedberg observed that Kempton was "a massively obese middle-aged man who ambulate[d] with a normal gait without the use of ambulatory aids. . . ." (PageID 455.) He was comfortable both sitting and standing. Kempton had normal memory, intellectual functioning, and orientation. Range of motion in the cervical spine was within normal limits. Muscle and grasp strength was well-preserved over the upper extremities. Manipulative ability was normal in both hands. There was no evidence of atrophy. (Id.)
On examination of the lumbar spine, Dr. Swedberg found no evidence of paravertebral muscle spasm or tenderness to percussion. Straight leg raising was normal on the right but diminished to just 30 degrees on the left. There was no tenderness to palpation of the hips. Range of flexion of the hips with the knees flexed was normal to 100 degrees bilaterally. (Id.) On neurological examination, there was no evidence of muscle weakness or atrophy. Pinprick and light touch were diminished from the left mid thigh down. The left patellar and Achilles tendon reflexes were hyperactive. The contralateral reflexes were brisk. Abduction of the hips was normal, flexion of the knees was normal and plantar flexion of the ankle joints was normal. Dr. Swedberg's diagnostic impressions were morbid obesity and low back pain with prob-able radiculopathy. (PageID 456.)
Dr. Swedberg concluded that Kempton was capable of performing at least a mild to moderate amount of sitting, ambulating, standing, bending, kneeling, pushing, pulling, lifting and carrying. In addition, he would have no problems reaching, grasping or handling objects. (Id.) An x-ray of the lumbar spine was normal. (PageID 458.)
Kempton went to the emergency room on November 29, 2011, with complaints of difficulty breathing and coughing. He had a history of having smoked up to four packs of cigaretes a day since age 9. He had never had pulmonary function testing and did not have home oxygen. (PageID 643.) A chest x-ray showed no acute pulmonary disease. There was no pleural effusion. The lungs were clear. (PageID 649.) On exam-ination, there were some scattered rhonchi but no expiratory wheezing. (PageID 644.) Kempton was diagnosed with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-ease, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus 2, hyperlipidem-ia, depression and anxiety, degenerative joint disease, and hypokalemia, resolved. An antibiotic was prescribed, and he was advised to quit smoking. (PageID 644-45.)
On March 10, 2011, Kempton underwent a right shoulder arthroscopy, subacromnial decompression, distal clavicle resection, rotator cuff repair, and open biceps tenodesis. (PageID 587-89.) His postoperative diagnoses were right shoulder acromioclavicular joint arthritis, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tear. (PageID 587.)
On examination, Kempton had pain over the distal volar aspect of each forearm, across his wrist, and into his hands. (PageID 695.) Kempton had positive Tinel's test on both sides, positive wrist flexion test on both sides and thenar atrophy on both sides, especially on the left side. (Id.) Kempton was able to make a full fist with each hand with normal sensation. He displayed normal grip strength. Dr. Ward assessed a 30% permanent partial impairment. (PageID 696.)
Dr. Ward also completed a Physical Capacity Evaluation in which he found Kempton was limited to lifting 10 pounds occasionally. (PageID 692.) He also said that Kempton would not be able to perform repetitive pushing and pulling or fine manipulation. He was able to use his hands for simple grasping. He could not climb ladders. He was able to reach above shoulder level. (PageID 693.)
Kempton told Dr. Kao he was fighting for disability. His wife was also disabled. Although he took Zoloft, which helped some, he was still depressed. His energy was poor. He usually sat in a recliner all day and watched television. He had some manic episodes when he might go 4-5 days with little sleep but sill be energetic and do a lot of yard work.
On mental status examination, Dr. Kao found Kempton's eye contact was downward and rapport was difficult to establish due to anxiety. (PageID 345.) She noted he was wringing his hands the entire time and had a restricted affect. (Id.) She also reported his speech was low in volume and slow in rate. (Id.) Dr. Kao diagnosed Kempton with major depressive disorder (single episode, chronic), and anxiety disorder, NOS. She assigned a Global Assessment of Functioning ("GAF") score of 40. She increased Kempton's dosage of Zoloft from the 150mg prescribed by Dr. Tyree to 200 mg. (PageID 343-46.)
When seen on July 13, 2009, Kempton reported some improvement in his depression with Zoloft, but his anxiety was "still pretty bad." His mood was okay, but his affect was restricted. Dr. Kao kept his diagnoses as major depressive disorder (chronic), and anxiety disorder, NOS. She prescribed Klonopin in addition to Zoloft. Kempton was to see Dr. Kao in a month. She told him to bring the pill bottles in every time so she could get a pill count. (PageID 342.)
The next report from Dr. Kao is dated April 30, 2010. Dr. Kao's notes say that she had not seen Kempton, and he reported that he had been very depressed and had run out of his Zoloft. He did not get along well with his mother, who was in a nursing home with lung cancer. She did not want him to visit her. He had also lost his step father a year ago. Dr. Kao found Kempton's mood was depressed and his affect was restricted. His speech was very low in volume and slow in rate, and his eyes were downcast. She prescribed Zoloft. (PageID 574.)
Kempton reported feeling less depressed on May 14, 2010. Dr. Kao noted a restricted, very dysphoric affect and speech still low in volume and slow in rate. She diagnosed him with major depressive disorder (single episode, chronic). Dr. Koa was trying to set Kempton up with Scioto-Paint Valley for counseling. (PageID 573.)
During the mental status examination, Dr. Castle found that Kempton's affect was flat and his mood depressed. He said that he had crying spells every week or two. Kempton's IQ was estimated to be in low average range. She diagnosed Kempton with bipolar disorder II and assigned him a GAF score of 49. (PageID 545.) Dr. Castle stated the opinion that Kempton was moderately impaired in his ability to relate to others and to maintain attention, concentration, persistence, and pace to perform routine tasks. She found Kempton's ability to understand, remember, and follow instructions was mildly impaired. Dr. Castle concluded that Kempton's ability to withstand stress and pressures associated with day-to-day work activity was markedly impaired by his unstable mood. (PageID 546.)
In the narrative assessment of Kempton's ability to engage in work-related activities from a mental standpoint, Dr. Steiger noted that his allegation of worsening depression was supported, but Dr. Castle's opinion of marked limits in stress tolerance was not. Her review of the record suggested moderate limitation in that area. Dr. Steiger concluded that Kempton appeared to be mentally capable of learning and performing work tasks that are within his physical restrictions if the work setting did not have strict time or production demands. He could work best in settings in which he could work relatively independently and without close supervision. (PageID 550.)
Dr. Steiger concluded Kempton was moderately limited in the following abilities: perform activities within a schedule, maintain regular attendance, and be punctual within customary tolerances; complete a normal workday or workweek without interruptions from psychologically based symptoms and to perform at a consistent pace without an unreasonable number and length of rest periods; accept instructions and respond appropriately to criticism from superiors; get along with coworkers or peers without distracting them or exhibiting behavioral extremes; maintain socially appropriate behavior and to adhere to basic standards of neatness and cleanliness; and respond appropriately to changes in the work setting. Dr. Steiger concluded Kempton was markedly limited in his ability to interact appropriately with the general public. (PageID 548-49.)
(PageID 67-80.)
(Doc. 9, PageID 76-77.)
Plaintiff argues that the administrative law judge erred in finding he had the residual functional capacity for a range of light work because new and material evidence "resulted in an residual functional capacity finding different, at least to some degree, than ALJ Michaelson's." (Doc. 16, PageID 732.)
In finding that Kempton had the residual functional capacity for a range of light work, the administrative law judge properly considered the most recent denial of Kempton's prior claim at the hearing level, i.e., the September 16, 2008 administrative law judge decision. (PageID 140-57.) At that time, Administrative Law Judge Michaelson concluded that Kempton had the residual functional capacity to perform light work except that he could never perform overhead reaching with his non-dominant left arm. He could perform frequent (as distinct from constant) fine and gross manipulation with his non-dominant left hand and arm, but has no such limitations in his right hand and arm. He can perform jobs without high production requirements or those performed at a fast pace. He can work where no more than brief or superficial contact with others is necessary. (PageID 152-53.) Contrary to plaintiff's claim, the administrative law judge in the instant case appropriately recognized the application of Drummond v. Commissioner of Social Security, 126 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 1997) and res judicata. (PageID 65.)
The Sixth Circuit has held that, where the final decision of the Agency after a hearing on a prior disability claim contains a finding of a claimant's residual functional capacity, the Agency may not make a different finding in adjudicating a subsequent disability claim with an unadjudicated period arising under the same title of the Act as the prior claim unless new and additional evidence or changed circumstances provide a basis for a different finding. Drummond v. Commissioner, 126 F.3d at 842. Administrative Law Judge Keller discussed Drummond and acknowledged that there was a good deal of new medical evidence to consider since the September 2008 decision. (PageID 65.) However, Administrative law judge Keller adopted the light residual functional capacity found by Administrative Law Judge Michaelson. (Id.) Administrative Law Judge Keller's finding in this regard is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, including the shared assessment of the state agency reviewing physicians, Drs. McCloud and Klyop. (PageID 467-74, 547.) The administrative law judge also relied on the opinions of Dr. Aina and Dr. Castle by giving their opinions "some weight"; and Dr. Ward, by giving his opinion "partial weight." (PageID 77-78.) Therefore, the administrative law judge appropriately found that he was bound to find Plaintiff had almost the identical residual functional capacity, even considering the new and material evidence.
Plaintiff claims that the administrative law judge erred in finding that his condition did not worsen and relies on the treatment records from Dr. Kao; that Kempton established treatment with primary care physicians, Dr. Provaznik and Dr. Tyree; an October 2010 MRI; the March 2011 right shoulder surgery; and an emergency room visit on November 29, 2011. (See Doc. 16, PageID 730-32.) As an initial matter, the administrative law judge did not fail to consider this evidence, as Kempton alleges. The administrative law judge explicitly discussed the disability opinion given by Dr. Ward for Worker's Compensation purposes, Kempton's surgery to his right shoulder, Dr. Swedberg's opinion, and the November 2011 emergency room visit and also specifically referenced the exhibits containing the other diagnostic tests referenced by plaintiff. (PageID 74-76.) He also properly noted the February 2010 physical capacities evaluation of Dr. Provaznik
As noted above, in February 2010 and December 2011, Dr. Provaznik stated the opinion that Kempton could essentially perform less than sedentary work. (PageID 496-97, 670-71.) The only medical findings Dr. Provaznik cited supporting the limitations he found were: limited flexion lumbar spine (PageID 496) and physical exam. (PageID 670.) Con-sidering Dr. Provaznik's failure to support his limitations with clinical findings and medical test results, the administrative law judge reasonably concluded that his was not entitled to controlling weight. (PageID 77.) 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c)(2), (3) ("The more a medical source presents relevant evidence to support an opinion, particularly medical signs and laboratory findings, the more weight we will give that opinion."); SSR 96-2p. Notably, Dr. Provaznik did not even record significant examination findings at the time he gave the opinion that Kempton was disabled. For example, a review of the record reveals that Dr. Provaznik first examined Kempton in October 2009. (PageID 451.) Dr. Provaznik found chronic low back pain and pain to palpitation on examination. (PageID 447-51.) The mere presence of some pain and tenderness does not establish disability. Thus, Dr. Provaznik's contemporaneous treatment notes do not provide the kind of significant medical test results or clinical findings that would support his opinion of disability. See McClanahan v. Astrue, 2011 WL 672059 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 16, 2011) (Barrett, J.) ("the essent-ial problem with the four pages of forms that make up [the doctor's] opinion is that it is entirely conclusory. Other than stating that his observations are based on physical exams and history, [the doctor] gives no indication of what evidence his opinion is based on"); Ball v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2010 WL 5885538 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 7, 2010) (Wehrman, MJ) ("where a physician's conclusions regarding a claimant's capacity contain no substantiating medical data or other evidence, the administrative law judge is not required to credit such opinions"); Wallace v. Astrue, 3:10-cv-199 (S.D. Ohio July 14, 2010) (Ovington, MJ) (the administrative law judge reasonably did not give control-ling or substantial weight to treating physician's opinion where the doctor "provided no reasons in support of her opinions" apart from "listing several diagnoses and noting [the claimant's] `severe pain'").
Referencing the October 13, 2005 MRI of the cervical spine, which showed mild degenerative changes (PageID 339); the January 15, 2008 MRI of the lumbar spine, which showed mild wedging of the L1 and L2 vertebra with evidence of Schmorl's nodes and degenerative changes involving the facet joints in the lower lumbosacral spine (PageID 401); a left lower extremity EMG in February 2008 which indicated chronic S1 radiculopathy (PageID 505-06); and a May 2008 MRI of the cervical spine which showed multilevel cervical degenerative disc change and an extruded midline C6-7 disc (PageID 502-03); Kempton suggests that these tests provide the objective findings to support Dr. Provaznik's opinion. (Doc. 16, PageID 740.) However, these diagnostic test findings also fail to establish disability. For example, an x-ray of Kempton's lumbar spine taken in conjunction with Dr Swedberg's consultive examination was normal. (PageID 458.) In addition, all of the test results plaintiff relies on are dated before September 12, 2008.
As the administrative law judge appropriately noted, Dr. Provaznik's "far too extreme" opinion of disability was also inconsistent with other substantial evidence in the record. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(c)(2), (4) ("Generally, the more consistent an opinion is with the record as a whole, the more weight we will give to that opinion."). Drs. McCloud and Klyop, state agency physicians, concluded Kempton could perform a range of light work and that the new and material evidence did not warrant altering Administrative Law Judge Michaelson's residual functional capacity finding. (PageID 140-57, 467-74, 547.) The state agency reviewing physicians' shared opinion contradicts Dr. Provaznik's unsupported and conclusory opinion and provides further support for the administrative law judge's finding that Kempton could perform a range of light work.
As the administrative law judge noted, Dr. Provaznik's opinion was also inconsistent with Kempton's activities. (PageID 77.) For example, when evaluated by Dr. Tanley in June 2010, Kempton was noted to be clean and appropriately dressed. (PageID 464.) Kempton reported that he watched television, especially NASCAR, spoke on the phone and helped his wife with the housework. (PageID 464, 544.) In December 2010, Dr. Castle noted Kempton appeared adequately dressed and groomed. (PageID 544.) When examined by Dr. Aina in December 2010, Kempton reported he dressed himself and tied his shoes. (PageID 536.)
Plaintiff next argues that the administrative law judge selectively picked findings and opinions from reports by examining doctors to support his residual functional capacity finding. As an example, plaintiff points to the administrative law judge's reliance on the reports by Doctors Swedberg, Aina and Ward. The administrative law judge wrote:
The opinion assessed by Dr. Aina in December 2010 is also afforded some weight. Dr. Aina physically examined the claimant and his findings were essentially normal. The doctor's examination included range of motion studies and manual muscle testing. This is consistent with the other physical medical evidence of record and consistent with the ultimate findings reached by the undersigned in this decision. However, his assessment that the claimant could lift and carry 40 pounds occasionally is not adopted as this is not consistent with the weight of the medical evidence as a whole.
The opinion assessed by Dr. Ward in February 2011 is afforded partial weight. Dr. Ward performed a physical examination ofthe claimant. However, although Dr. Ward opined that the claimant had no limitations in his ability to sit, stand or walk which is consistent with the ultimate findings reached in this decision, Dr. Ward's opinion that the claimant could only lift 10 pounds is not fully consistent with the medical evidence of record as a whole.
(Id., PageID 77-78.)
As to Dr. Swedberg, plaintiff asserts that the administrative law judge stated that there was no evidence Kempton experienced true radicular type pain. (Id., PageID 76.) Yet Dr. Swedberg found that Kepton's straight leg raising was diminished to 30 degrees on the left, and his assessment was low back pain with probable radiculopathy. (Id., PageID 355-56.) Nonetheless, the office notes from Drs. Tyree and Provaznik indicate negative straight leg raising, and there is no indication of neurological deficits, muscle weakness, or other clinical diagnosis supporting a finding of nerve root impingement. There are no x-rays, MRIs or other medical tests demonstrating any significant bony abnormality or nerve root impingement. The range of motion in the lumbar spine is not severely limited.
Plaintiff argues that although Dr. Aina reported that because of Kempton's impairments "[p]rolonged standing and sitting for more than forty-five minutes to one hour may be affected", the administrative law judge selected other parts of his report and did not consider that opinion. But for the reasons outlined above, I conclude that the administrative law judge adequately explained his reasons for making the residual functional capacity findings he did and rejecting Dr. Aina's conclusion that Kempton's ability to stand for more than 45 minutes "might be affected."
Next the plaintiff argues that the administrative law judge said that he assigned "partial weight" to Dr. Ward's opinion but rejected his opinion that Kempton could lift a maximum of 10 pounds and could not perform fine manipulation. Yet he emphasized that Dr. Ward found plaintiff had just a 30% permanent, partial disability. However, Dr. Ward was only evaluating plaintiff's workers' compensation claim for disability arising from a work related injury to his wrists and hands. He did not evaluate any other physical impairment. While that statement of the administrative law judge misreads Dr. Ward's report, his overall reading of the evidence of record does not. And his residual functional capacity findings are supported by substantial evidence. That is a fair criticism of the administrative law judge's discussion of Dr. Ward's report, but on balance that report does not undermine the administrative law judge's residual functional capacity finding that Kempton retained the ability to perform a reduced range of jobs having light exertional demands.
Finally, plaintiff argues that when analyzing Dr. Castle's opinion the administrative law judge erred when he discounted it by asserting that the GAF score she assigned of 49 indicated a moderate symptoms. In fact, a GAF score of 49 is consistent with serious symptoms such as an inability to keep a job. Social Security Administrative Message 13066 (effective July 22, 2013) provides that "a GAF rating is opinion evidence [and that as] with other opinion evidence, the extent to which an adjudicator can rely on the GAF rating is consistent with other evidence, how familiar the rater is with the claimant, and the rater's expertise." However, plaintiff has not seen his psychological problems as significant enough to get treatment for them from anyone other than his primary care doctors. Their office notes do not demonstrate that Kempton suffers from psychological impairments that would prevent him from working.
I conclude that there is substantial evidence supporting the administrative law judge's decision denying benefits. Accordingly, it is
If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties a motion for reconsideration by the Court, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B); Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also, Small v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).
