Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HUNTER, 3:13CR098-2. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20140612d73 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2014
Summary: FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE OF DEFENDANT BRYAN HUNTER'S ASSETS THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 45) ordering the forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(a)(1) and (2), of the following property: a. $6,365.00; and b. 9mm Taurus Handgun, SN: TIA65900, 9mm magazine and 15 rounds of ammunition; WHEREAS, the United States published notice of this forfeiture action and the intent of the United States to dispose
More

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE OF DEFENDANT BRYAN HUNTER'S ASSETS

THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 45) ordering the forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2), of the following property:

a. $6,365.00; and b. 9mm Taurus Handgun, SN: TIA65900, 9mm magazine and 15 rounds of ammunition;

WHEREAS, the United States published notice of this forfeiture action and the intent of the United States to dispose of the property in accordance with law, and further notified all parties of their right to petition the Court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of their alleged interest in the property, beginning on February 11, 2014 and continuing for at least thirty (30) consecutive days, on the www.forfeiture.gov website (Doc. 57); and

WHEREAS, the United States sent direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to all persons who reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture of the property in an ancillary proceeding (Doc. 58); and

WHEREAS, no timely petition has been filed to the property listed above; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant was sentenced and a Judgment was entered on February 7, 2014 and that Judgment ordered the forfeiture of the above-referenced property (Doc. 43); and

WHEREAS, the Court finds that defendant had an interest in the property; the United States has established the requisite nexus between the property and the offense; and the United States has established that the property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2);

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 45) ordering the forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2) of the following property:

a. $6,365.00; and b. 9mm Taurus Handgun, SN: TIA65900, 9mm magazine and 15 rounds of ammunition;

is final; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all right, title and interest to the property described above is hereby condemned, forfeited and vested in the United States of America and the United States has clear title to the property described above; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the custodian of the property is hereby authorized to dispose of the property in accordance with the law; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer