LINDENBERGER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, C-1-13-380. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140620e04
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 12) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case. This Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND INCORP
Summary: ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 12) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case. This Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND INCORPO..
More
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 12) to which neither party has objected.
Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case. This Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS AND INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE HEREIN the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 12). Plaintiff=s Complaint is DISMISSED and this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
