U.S. v. JACKSON, 2:09-CR-21(1). (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140722b12
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter came on for consideration upon Government's Motion to Cancel Re-Sentencing Hearing of Defendant (ECF No. 105) filed on June 30, 2014. Defendant has failed to respond. The Court agrees with the Government that the Sixth Circuit provided an extremely limited remand and there is nothing for the Court to consider. The Court can only impose the 150 month sentence mandated by the Sixth Circuit opinion. There is, therefore, no need to conduct a he
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter came on for consideration upon Government's Motion to Cancel Re-Sentencing Hearing of Defendant (ECF No. 105) filed on June 30, 2014. Defendant has failed to respond. The Court agrees with the Government that the Sixth Circuit provided an extremely limited remand and there is nothing for the Court to consider. The Court can only impose the 150 month sentence mandated by the Sixth Circuit opinion. There is, therefore, no need to conduct a hea..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter came on for consideration upon Government's Motion to Cancel Re-Sentencing Hearing of Defendant (ECF No. 105) filed on June 30, 2014. Defendant has failed to respond.
The Court agrees with the Government that the Sixth Circuit provided an extremely limited remand and there is nothing for the Court to consider. The Court can only impose the 150 month sentence mandated by the Sixth Circuit opinion. There is, therefore, no need to conduct a hearing and no need to waste judicial resources as well as money.
The Court finds that the Government's Motion is well taken and the Court GRANTS the same. The sentencing hearing scheduled for August 19, 2014 is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
