REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS1

SHARON L. OVINGTON, Magistrate Judge.

This case is before the Court upon the Motion For Authorization Of Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff's attorney (Doc. #18) and the record as a whole. The Commissioner has not filed a Memorandum in Opposition, and Plaintiff reports that the Commissioner does not object to the reasonableness of the fee request. Id., PageID at 121.

The Motion seeks an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the total amount of $22,000.00. (Doc. #18, PageID at 126). In the absence of opposition by the Commissioner, the Motion and supporting Exhibits establish that an award of attorney fees is warranted under 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount the Motion seeks.

Plaintiff's counsel notes that two past awards of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) occurred in this matter. The first EAJA award under 28 U.S.C. §2412 occurred in May 2006 in the amount of $3,400.00; the second occurred in November 2013 in the amount of $3,550.00. (Doc. #17); see Mack v. Comm'r., 3:05cv00063 (Doc. #18). Plaintiff's counsel thus points out that "given the EAJA offset..., Plaintiff will pay out-of-pocket much less than $22,000.00." (Doc. #18, PageID at 126). This is correct because counsel must offset a total of the previous EAJA awards, $6,950.00, from the $22,000.00 presently due him under §406(b)(1). See Jankovich v. Bowen, 868 F.2d 867, 871 n.1 (6th Cir. 1989).

Accordingly, the Motion for Allowance of Attorney Fees is well taken.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: