BRYANT v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 1:13-cv-803. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140916e52
Filed: Sep. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2014
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 14) TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on August 15, 2014, submitted a Report and R
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 14) TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on August 15, 2014, submitted a Report and Re..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 14)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on August 15, 2014, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 14). The Petitioner filed objections.1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:
1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED; and
2. Petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance (Doc. 3) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Petitioner's objections are overruled for the reasons articulated in the Report and Recommendations. (See Doc. 14).
Source: Leagle
