HESSON EX REL. JDH v. COLVIN, 2:13-cv-926. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141014k87
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court for consideration of the September 22, 2014, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff's statement of errors be overruled, and that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the repo
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court for consideration of the September 22, 2014, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). The magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff's statement of errors be overruled, and that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the repor..
More
ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for consideration of the September 22, 2014, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). The magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff's statement of errors be overruled, and that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the report would "result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation." Doc. 21, p. 12.
The court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the court adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 21). Plaintiff's statement of errors is overruled, and the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security.
Source: Leagle
